![]() “Further proof can be found in the report Discrimination and the Irish Community in Britain published by the Commission for Racial Equality in 1997. Ample evidence exists in numerous oral history interviews with both Caribbean and Irish migrants that such signs existed well into the 60s. ![]() He added: “I’m puzzled by what exactly Mr Draper is trying to prove. But this took place in the mid-90s, a decade after the original photograph was donated”. “ claims the photograph was ‘mocked up’ for the exhibition An Irish Experience. Numerous artefacts with minimal provenance are held in archives but this does not necessarily mean they are not genuine. “Mr Draper appears to be confusing authenticity with provenance. ![]() “We had no reason to doubt the authenticity of the image and that the archive had received it in good faith. An example of an anti-Irish 'NINA' sign from the United States.Īnd he's right – Draper’s paper-thin claim that the photograph was faked is based merely on the fact it was donated decades after it was taken.Īs Dr Murray explained: “With community ventures of this kind, such items are not always formally acquisitioned and their provenance not always recorded. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |